RUSSIAN INFLUENCE STRATEGIES IN TURKISH MEDIA AND THE MEANS OF RESISTING THEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-242X.2025.31.111-117

Keywords:

media linguistics, corpus analysis, Turkish media, Russian propaganda, Russo-Ukrainian war

Abstract

Background. Russia strives to creating a negative image of Ukraine within Turkiye using Turkish media sphere amidst the Russo-Ukrainian war. The Russian influence on the Turkish media sphere was researched by Gölcü, Nurlanova, Samet, Baykal and Durmuş. However, the narrow set of data was not sufficient to produce strategies to resist Russian propaganda about Ukraine in Turkiye.

Objectives. We aimed at identifying means of influence that Russian propaganda uses to persuade the Turkish population to percieve Ukraine negatively.

Methods. In this work, we use corpus, discourse and content analysis to establish both quantitative and qualitative understanding of the problem.

Results. We found that not only pro-Russian media outlets we studied (Sputnik, Aydınlık) were spreading Russian rhetoric, but also neutral websites (Sabah, CNNTürk) were creating a platform for messages which undermine trust in Ukraine and its government. Lexemes like «regime», «nazis» and «drug addicts», emotionally charged phrases and euphimisation apply suggestive influence to create a negative perception of Ukraine in consciousness of the population of Turkiye.

Conclusions. Based on the results, we suggest means of multitopical positive storytelling as the main strategy of resisting Russian propaganda in Turkiye for Ukraine.

References

Akser, M., & Baybars-Hawks, B. (2024). Media systems and media capture in Turkey: A case study. Media and Communication, 12, 1–17. https://doi.org/ 10.17645/mac.7733

Akser, M., & Baybars, B. (2023). Repressed media and illiberal politics in Turkey: the persistence of fear. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 23(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2022.2088647

Alp, H. (2016). The Reproduction of Hate Speech Against Gypsies in Ekşi Sözlük. Ankara Universitesi ILEF Dergisi, 3(2), 143–172 [in Turkish]. [Çingenelere yönelik nefret söyleminin Ekşi Sözlük'te yeniden üretilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi İLEF Dergisi, 3(2), 143–172]. https://doi.org/10.24955/ilef.305520

Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. (1988/2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.

Durmuş, A. (2023). Sosyal medyada propaganda: Rusya-Ukrayna savaşı örneği. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology, 14(52), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2023.01.003.x

Gölcü, A., & Nurlanova, A. (2022). Savaşın Söylemi, Söylemin Savaşı: Sputnik Haber Ajansının Rusya-Ukrayna Çatışması Haberlerinin Söylemi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 49, 231–250. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1158725

Grynyuk, Svitlana. (2022). The Concepts of Media Discourse and Media Text as Major Categories of Media Linguistics: Towards an Understanding of their Interdependence. Publishing House "Baltija Publishing". https://doi.org/ 10.30525/978-9934-26-283-8-4

Kallio, S. (2021). Time to update our suggestibility scales. Consciousness and Cognition, 90, 103103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103103

Kern, M. L., Park, G., Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Sap, M., Smith, L. K., & Ungar, L. H. (2016). Gaining insights from social media language: Methodologies and challenges. Psychological methods, 21(4), 507.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

Lychkovska, O. R. (2002). Content analysis of mass communication texts. Astroprynt [in Ukrainian]. [Личковська, О. Р. (2002). Контент-аналіз тек-стів масової комунікації. Астропринт].

Nakonechna, Y. (2023). Proposing of suggestive influence detection and classification method based on fuzzy logic and feature driven analysis. Theoretical and Applied Cybersecurity, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20535/tacs.2664-29132023.1.283565

Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and the English Language. Mount Holyoke College. Horizon, 13(76), 252–265. https://archive.org/details/PoliticsAndThe EnglishLanguage/page/n13/mode/2up

Page, R., Barton, D., Lee, C., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M. (2022). Researching language and social media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315771786

Petryk, V. M., Prysiazhniuk, M. M., Kompantseva, L. F., Skulysh, Ye. D., Boiko, O. D., & Ostroukhov, V. V. (2023). Suggestive technologies of manipulative influence (2nd ed.). In Ye. D. Skulysha (Ed.). Vyd. dim "SKIF" [in Ukrainian]. [Петрик, В. М., Присяжнюк, М. М., Компанцева, Л. Ф., Скулиш, Є. Д., Бойко, О. Д., & Остроухов, В. В. (2023). Сугестивні технології маніпу-лятивного впливу (2-ге вид.). У Є. Д. Скулиша (Ред.). Вид. дім "СКІФ"].

Potapenko, S. (2024). Ukrainian president Zelenskyy's speeches to neighboring states' parliaments: media rhetorical perspective. Linguistic studies, 48, 37–47.

Samet, Ş. E. N., & Baykal, K. C. (2023). Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşı Haberlerİnde Tarafsızlık Sorunu: Amerika'nin Sesi Ve Sputnik Üzerine Mukayeseli Bir İnceleme. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 143(143), 353–373 http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.70794

Shevchenko, L., & Syzonov, D. (2021). Theory of Medialinguistics. Publishing and Printing Center "Kyiv University" [in Ukrainian]. [Шевченко, Л., & Сизонов, Д. (2021). Теорія меіалінгвістики]. ВПЦ "Київський університет".

Syzonov, D. Yu. (2015). Methods of linguistic research of media text: to the problem of scientific interpretation. Current problems of Ukrainian linguistics: theory and practice, 30, 53–62 [in Ukrainian]. [Сизонов, Д. Ю. (2015). Методи лінгвістичного дослідження медіатексту: до проблеми наукової інтерпретації. Актуальні проблеми української лінгвістики: теорія і практика, 30, 53–62].

Tyshchenko, K. M. (2007). Fundamentals of Linguistics. Publishing and Printing Center "Kyiv University" [in Ukrainian]. [Тищенко, К. М. (2007). Основи мовознавства. ВПЦ "Київський університет"].

Van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Media contents: The interdisciplinary study of news as discourse, pp. 108–120. Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2021). Discourse and the denial of racism. In I. Fairclough, J. Mulderrig, & K. Zotzmann (Eds.), Language and power: Essays in honour of Norman Fairclough (pp. 147–155). Independent Publication.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2021a). Spanish discourse on refugees. In A. M. Bañón, & B. McGuirk (Eds.), Refugees in conflict and post-conflict: Media, artistic and political representations (vol. 12). Critical, Cultural and Communication Press

Van Dijk, T. A. (2022). The discourse, cognition, society framework. Paper presented at the IX Colóquio ALED Brasil, Universidad de Vitória, Espírito Santo.

Vaughan, E., & O'Keeffe, A. (2015). Corpus analysis. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1–17.

Webster, F. (2014). Theories of the information society. Routledge.

Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (Eds.). (2017). Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Downloads

Published

29.12.2025

How to Cite

RUSSIAN INFLUENCE STRATEGIES IN TURKISH MEDIA AND THE MEANS OF RESISTING THEM. (2025). BULLETIN OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KYIV. ORIENTAL LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES, 1(31), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-242X.2025.31.111-117